- AI Business Insights
- Posts
- Simulate a boardroom debate for better decisions
Simulate a boardroom debate for better decisions
Three experts stress-test ideas
TL;DR: Don’t settle for a single AI perspective. Use this multi-persona prompt to force a debate between a CFO, CMO, and Architect to stress-test your ideas.
We often fall into the trap of using AI as a sounding board that simply agrees with us, but that doesn’t help when you need to identify actual risks in a business plan. You need critical feedback from conflicting angles to ensure your strategy holds water. This Reddit user shared a brilliant approach to solving this by simulating a conflict-heavy boardroom meeting. The contributor calls it the ‘Multi-Persona Conflict’ framework.
Instead of asking for a generic critique, the author sets up a scenario where the AI must roleplay three distinct experts with competing incentives. This forces the model to argue with itself, uncovering blind spots you might have missed.
The Lithium Boom is Heating Up
Thanks to growing demand, lithium stock prices grew 2X+ from June 2025 to January 2026. $ALB climbed as high as 227%. $LAC hit 151%. $SQM, 159%.
This $1B unicorn’s patented technology can recover 3X more lithium than traditional methods. That’s earned investment from leaders like General Motors.
Now they’re preparing for commercial production just as experts project 5X demand growth by 2040. They’ve announced what could be one of the US’ largest lithium production facilities and have rights to approximately 150,000 lithium-rich acres across North and South America.
Unlike public stocks, you can buy private EnergyX shares alongside 40,000+ other investors. Invest for $11/share by the 2/26 deadline.
This is a paid advertisement for EnergyX Regulation A offering. Please read the offering circular at invest.energyx.com. Under Regulation A, a company may change its share price by up to 20% without requalifying the offering with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Prompt
Here is the exact prompt provided by the expert:
I am proposing [Your Idea]. Act as a panel of three experts: a Skeptical CFO, a Growth-Focused CMO, and a Technical Architect. Conduct a 3-round debate. Round 1: Each expert identifies one fatal flaw. Round 2: Each expert proposes a fix for the other’s flaw. Round 3: Synthesize a final ‘Bulletproof Strategy.’
Why It Works
This prompt is effective because it leverages Adversarial Persona Assignment. By defining the experts with specific traits (e.g., “Skeptical” CFO vs. “Growth-Focused” CMO), the prompt forces the Large Language Model (LLM) to break out of its standard neutral tone and adopt specific biases. This prevents the “toxic positivity” often found in AI responses where the model tries to be too helpful.
Furthermore, the Iterative Structure (Rounds 1-3) acts as a constrained Chain-of-Thought. It prevents the AI from jumping straight to a conclusion. It must first dismantle the idea (Round 1), then repair it (Round 2), and finally synthesize the findings (Round 3). This step-by-step logic yields a much higher quality output than a simple “critique this” command.
Turn AI into Your Income Engine
Ready to transform artificial intelligence from a buzzword into your personal revenue generator?
HubSpot’s groundbreaking guide "200+ AI-Powered Income Ideas" is your gateway to financial innovation in the digital age.
Inside you'll discover:
A curated collection of 200+ profitable opportunities spanning content creation, e-commerce, gaming, and emerging digital markets—each vetted for real-world potential
Step-by-step implementation guides designed for beginners, making AI accessible regardless of your technical background
Cutting-edge strategies aligned with current market trends, ensuring your ventures stay ahead of the curve
Download your guide today and unlock a future where artificial intelligence powers your success. Your next income stream is waiting.
*Ad
Other awesome AI guides you may enjoy
Variations to Try
Swap the Experts: If you aren’t doing business strategy, change the roles. for a coding project, use a “Legacy Code Purist,” a “Bleeding Edge Enthusiast,” and a “Security Auditor.”
Add a Moderator: Insert a “CEO” persona who has to listen to the first two rounds and make a final “Go/No-Go” decision before the strategy is synthesized.
Use Cases
SaaS Feature Launch: Check if a new feature is technically feasible but financial suicide.
Marketing Budgets: Balance the need for aggressive ad spend against fiscal responsibility.
Architecture Migration: Weigh the benefits of moving to a new tech stack against the potential downtime risks.
This approach turns the AI into a team rather than a chatbot.
Stop typing prompt essays
Dictate full-context prompts and paste clean, structured input into ChatGPT or Claude. Wispr Flow preserves your nuance so AI gives better answers the first time. Try Wispr Flow for AI.
*Ad



