Prompt Framework That Actually Works

Craft Perfect AI Prompts With This Framework

December 12, 2025

Most people blame the algorithm when they generate generic or hallucinated content. But if you treat a powerful language model like a magic 8-ball, you are guaranteed to get vague results.

I found a breakdown by this savvy professional that completely changed how I look at structuring requests!

The core philosophy shared by the original poster is that prompt engineering requires a rigid framework, not just creative writing. This industry pro suggests that a prompt isn’t a sentence; it is a set of instructions comprising six distinct components.

In partnership with

Shoppers are adding to cart for the holidays

Peak streaming time continues after Black Friday on Roku, with the weekend after Thanksgiving and the weeks leading up to Christmas seeing record hours of viewing. Roku Ads Manager makes it simple to launch last-minute campaigns targeting viewers who are ready to shop during the holidays. Use first-party audience insights, segment by demographics, and advertise next to the premium ad-supported content your customers are streaming this holiday season.

Read the guide to get your CTV campaign live in time for the holiday rush.

The Mechanics of a Perfect Prompt

The framework forces the user to move beyond simple commands and act as an architect of the answer. By defining the Role, Task, Context, Reasoning, Format, and Stop Condition, you effectively sandbox the AI. This prevents it from wandering off-topic or reverting to its default, vanilla training data. The author argues that structure reduces vagueness, and clear logic checks boost accuracy.

Key Framework Components

The Power of Negative Constraints

One of the most valuable takeaways from this expert’s analysis is the emphasis on exclusions within the context phase. It is not enough to tell the AI what you want; you must explicitly tell it what you do not want. In the guide, the creator explains that adding context prevents irrelevant answers, but adding exclusions forces the AI to dig deeper.

For example, by explicitly forbidding generic advice like “dress well,” the model has to search its training data for more substantial, data-backed strategies. This prevents the fluff that plagues most standard outputs.

The Logic Layer Validation

I rarely see this step included in standard guides, but the author includes a specific “Reasoning” section in the template. This instructs the AI to validate its own output before presenting it. The expert advises users to ask the model to base its recommendations on hiring data, validated practices, or logic checks.

By forcing the AI to “apply clear reasoning,” you are essentially asking it to show its work or at least run a quality assurance check on its own generation. This step is crucial for professional tasks where accuracy outweighs creativity.

Controlling the Chaos with Stop Conditions

The final piece of the puzzle that this innovator highlights is the “Stop Condition.” Language models have a tendency to ramble or repeat themselves to fill space. The post’s author suggests defining exactly when the task is complete.

This acts as a hard brake for the generation process. Whether it is a specific number of strategies or a confirmation of accuracy, setting a stop condition ensures the AI knows exactly where the finish line is. This prevents the output from trailing off into hallucinations or repetitive summaries that add no value.

Turn AI Into Extra Income

You don’t need to be a coder to make AI work for you. Subscribe to Mindstream and get 200+ proven ideas showing how real people are using ChatGPT, Midjourney, and other tools to earn on the side.

From small wins to full-on ventures, this guide helps you turn AI skills into real results, without the overwhelm.

*Ad

Other awesome AI guides you may enjoy

Try It Yourself

Here is the exact template and example provided by the expert for you to test.

The Template:

Act as [Role] to [Task].
Consider the following context: [Context: details, rules, and exclusions].
Apply clear reasoning: [Reasoning: validation, accuracy, logic checks].
Return the response in this format: [Output format].
The task is complete when [Stop condition].

The Example:

Act as a career coach to create 5 unique strategies for standing out in a tech job interview.
Consider the following context: The audience is fresh graduates entering the tech industry, and exclude generic advice such as “dress well” or “be confident.”
Apply clear reasoning: Base recommendations on hiring data, validated practices from recruiters, and logical steps to ensure practicality.
Return the response in this format: A table with [Strategy | Why it matters | How to implement].
The task is complete when 5 strategies are provided by you, validated for accuracy, and clearly actionable.

If you want to stop fighting with the chatbot and start getting usable data, this structure is worth a read!

AI that actually handles customer service. Not just chat.

Most AI tools chat. Gladly actually resolves. Returns processed. Tickets routed. Orders tracked. FAQs answered. All while freeing up your team to focus on what matters most — building relationships. See the difference.

*Ad