NotebookLM quietly became something else

One question breaks the walls

August 10, 2026

In partnership with

I opened it last week expecting the usual and got a different product. The name had changed. The buttons had moved. Features I had never noticed were suddenly sitting in the middle of the screen.

NotebookLM is now Gemini Notebook, and the rename is the least interesting thing about the update.

I found a walkthrough that went through every change one by one, and I was genuinely surprised at how much more capable it had become while I was not paying attention.

How Jennifer Aniston’s LolaVie brand grew sales 40% with CTV ads

For its first CTV campaign, Jennifer Aniston’s DTC haircare brand LolaVie had a few non-negotiables. The campaign had to be simple. It had to demonstrate measurable impact. And it had to be full-funnel.

LolaVie used Roku Ads Manager to test and optimize creatives — reaching millions of potential customers at all stages of their purchase journeys. Roku Ads Manager helped the brand convey LolaVie’s playful voice while helping drive omnichannel sales across both ecommerce and retail touchpoints.

The campaign included an Action Ad overlay that let viewers shop directly from their TVs by clicking OK on their Roku remote. This guided them to the website to buy LolaVie products.

Discover how Roku Ads Manager helped LolaVie drive big sales and customer growth with self-serve TV ads.

The DTC beauty category is crowded. To break through, Jennifer Aniston’s brand LolaVie, worked with Roku Ads Manager to easily set up, test, and optimize CTV ad creatives. The campaign helped drive a big lift in sales and customer growth, helping LolaVie break through in the crowded beauty category.

*Ad

The pitch has not changed, which is the point

If you have never touched it, here is the whole idea in one line. It is an AI that digs into a specific topic using only the sources you approve.

That single constraint is why it hallucinates so much less than a general chat window. It is grounded in your material, not the entire internet.

You log in with a Google account at notebook.google.com and that is the whole setup.

Three panels now run the show

The left panel is your knowledge base. It holds the sources you upload, plus anything Gemini finds and you approve.

The middle panel is chat. It feels like an ordinary conversation, except it only pulls from your sources and drops inline citations you can click to read the exact passage it used.

The right panel is the studio. That is where research turns into podcasts, slide decks, infographics, videos, quizzes, and more.

What counts as a source has quietly expanded too. PDFs, websites, YouTube links, audio, images, and living Google Drive documents that update themselves whenever you edit the original.

The GTM Playbook Behind Warmly's Acquisition

Warmly ran pipeline, outreach, and lead scoring on autopilot for hundreds of startups — before a single sales hire.

HubSpot acquired them for it. Now the cofounders are walking you through the exact system, live, before they disappear into product. Join the Builder Session on August 12.

Leave with an agentic GTM stack you can replicate this week. Plus HubSpot Credits when you join HubSpot for Startups.

*Ad

The twist most people will never find

Gemini Notebook is famous for staying locked inside your sources. That is the entire reputation.

But the walkthrough demonstrates a behavior almost nobody stumbles into. Ask it something like are there contrarian or lesser-known viewpoints not represented in these sources and it understands it has permission to leave. It thinks, goes out, and hunts down fresh reputable material.

Then you ask a normal question and it snaps straight back into careful source-only mode.

So it is a walled garden and a researcher at the same time, and which one you get depends entirely on how you phrase the ask. That flexibility is the thing that changed how I think about the tool.

The workflow I copied line for line

The creator runs the same short sequence on any topic messy enough to deserve it. Their example was the environmental impact of AI, which is exactly the kind of question where the sources fight each other.

Load your sources first. Upload PDFs, paste website links with a space between each one, drop in YouTube videos. If a source turns red, download it as a PDF or paste the raw text instead.

Then let Gemini fill the gaps. Type your topic and let it search the web for more material. Verify each suggestion comes from a reputable site before you approve it, because approving lazily is how you poison the whole notebook.

Then run three analysis prompts, which I will come back to in a second.

Save the answers that land. Click save to note, then convert to source, so Gemini keeps that nuance in mind for every later response.

Finally, go to the studio and pick a format.

Two Minutes to Know What Slow Billing Is Costing You

Most SaaS finance teams know their billing process is slow.Most SaaS finance teams know their billing process is slow. Few know what it's costing them.

The Tabs Billing Lag Calculator puts a dollar figure on it in two minutes — benchmarked against top SaaS companies.

*Ad

The three prompts are where the real gold is

Ask for contrarian or lesser-known viewpoints missing from your sources.

Ask what important subtopics or questions are barely covered.

Ask where the sources disagree or contradict each other.

That third one is the one people skip, and it is the one that pays. Running it on the AI and environment topic surfaced a claim buried in the research that using AI for writing and illustration produced 130 to 2,900 times lower carbon emissions than human writers and illustrators.

Even the creator admitted that number was strange to sit with. That is the point. A conflict you can see is worth more than a summary that smoothed it over.

The studio is where it pulls ahead of everything else

Audio overview gives you a podcast-style deep dive, and you can jump in and talk to it live while it runs.

Slide decks come in presenter style or detailed, with a revise button for edits instead of a full regeneration.

Video overviews come as cinematic, explainer, or the new short-form clips built for what the walkthrough cheerfully calls educational doom scrolling.

Mind maps, reports, flashcards, quizzes, and data tables cover retention on one end and polished deliverables on the other.

Infographics come out genuinely ready to post.

The rough edges are real and worth knowing

The person who made the walkthrough is honest about what does not work yet, which is why I trusted the rest of it.

Cinematic videos take a long time and often are not good enough end to end.

The detailed infographic setting crams in too much and produces spelling and logic errors.

Neither of those is a reason to skip the studio. They are a reason to know which settings to avoid before you waste twenty minutes.

Four tips I would not have worked out alone

Fix messy infographics somewhere else. Drop the exported image into ChatGPT and ask it to fix all errors. Its image tools catch misspellings, bad grammar, and even wrong equations, and often come back clean on the first pass.

Use auto-label to focus. Let it sort your sources into topic tabs, then deselect entire groups so the chat answers only from the material you care about right now.

Clean up your notebooks. Rename the auto-generated titles and summaries to something short and literal, so you can tell one notebook from another at a glance instead of reading five lines of generated preamble.

Bounce to Gemini when you want to be creative. Every notebook now appears in the Gemini app, where you can run several separate chats against the same knowledge base. Accuracy lives in Notebook, creativity lives in Gemini, and they sync both ways.

That last one is my favorite, because the tool's biggest strength has always doubled as its biggest limitation. Grounding is what makes it trustworthy, and grounding is exactly what gets in the way when you want to brainstorm. Now you can have both without rebuilding your sources.

The notebook I am rebuilding tonight

What surprised me was not any single feature. It was realizing I had been using a research assistant as a glorified PDF summarizer for months.

The three prompts are what changed my mind. Not because they are clever, but because they are the only part of the workflow that goes looking for what is missing instead of tidying up what is already there.

So do this tonight. Open one notebook you already have, the one with sources you trust, and run the contradiction prompt on it. Ask where the sources disagree. Then save whatever comes back as a note and convert it to a source, so the notebook remembers the argument instead of the summary. If the answer is boring, you have lost four minutes. If it is not, you just found the thing your research was quietly hiding from you.